Before we get into today’s conversation, I want to be very, very clear. What I am about to say does not apply to “all” talks, panels, key notes, etc. It does apply to a growing number of talks that are given at conventions, as part of webinar series, and especially some (important distinction here) vendor specific events. Ok, ok… I know you want to know what in the world I am talking about, so here it is. Talks, in general, are becoming little more than self-congratulatory statements. Many are becoming almost toxically positive like a self-improvement “you’ve got this” session instead of presenting anything of (relatively) real substance.
Microsoft has said in previous statements that the Recall feature will not be enabled by default and will be set up as Opt-In. Several researchers have found that the feature is enabled in the background even if it might not be fully set up. This last part is important as the feature being enabled does not mean that Recall is already capturing your data, at the time of this writing, I have not seen evidence of data capture by this feature. However, it still a bit disappointing that Microsoft has this enabled by default when it should be 100% opt-in (including enabling or installing the feature).
The internet is a great thing. It has allowed peoples of different nations and geographical locations to meet, talk, share information and ideas. The massively connected world we live thanks to the internet is one where information of all kinds is literally at our fingertips. Hovering over all these good things has always been the shadow of censorship, control and digital spying. It has also given rise to crime on a massive scale, multiple new types of bullying, harassment, and assault. Still the idea of massive censorship and information control is one that most would agree is a bad thing.
Facebook has not had the best history when it comes to handling online bullying, social stalking and even sexual abuse and exploitation. They do have and are continuing to develop tools to fight against this, but for the most part they do not take a very proactive role in policing this type of behavior. To some it seems that they spend more time “fact checking” and policing opinions than they do addressing any truly bad behavior. It is up to the user to make sure they are practicing good and safe habits when using Facebook or Instagram, not the platform.
Read more: Facebook’s History Gives Concerns about Social...
There has been a lot of talk about Meta’s The Reality Labs department losing $10 Billion on devilment of Metaverse. Mant articles have focused on the negative and the overall amount of money lost while others have chosen to focus on more positive or normalized effects of the loss and what is means long term. The argument seems to be split in a couple of ways. The first is that $10 Billion is not a devastating loss in terms of R&D on a potential defining product for a company that made $117+ Billion in 2021. The second is that a $10 Billion dollar loss on a new product is a bad thing and might be an indication of a lack of true acceptance.
Page 1 of 3